Application 10 -
Keep your color under control with color-guide sphere
In todays world color consistency is an important criterion in the purchasing decision. Therefore, reliable color control according to ISO 9000 is the key to a good customer supplier relationship.
Whatever the application may be, the requirements for portable color measurement are the same:
This note explores how the BYK-Gardner color-guide
sphere instrument meets and even exceeds all these requirements.
For more details on the new LED technology used in the color-guide sphere please
refer to Application 9.
Control the Color
In order to deliver consistent color on the final product several steps of the production process need to be controlled
Color instruments using the sphere geometry with the specular component included objectively measure the color hue. The sample is diffusely illuminated by means of a white coated integrated sphere (Fig. 1.)

Fig. 1 Sphere Geometry specular included
Baffles in the inside prevent the incoming light from directly illuminating the sample surface. Measurement is done using an 8° viewing angle and the total reflected light is reported:
Total reflection = diffuse reflection (color) + direct reflection (gloss)
Therefore, differences in gloss or texture will not cause color differences. To ensure accurate and repeatable results a reference principle (dual beam principle) is used. The interior wall of the sphere is measured before each sample measurement to monitor any aging of the sphere wall and light output variance of the lamp due to voltage and temperature changes.
Analytical Studies
The color-guide sphere instrument was compared to several competitive commercially available, portable instruments:
Minolta CM-508d, X-Rite SP88, Datacolor Microflash 200d and GretagMacbeth Color-Eye 580.
Test materials for the comparison included standard tiles from the British Ceramic Research Association (BCRA), glossy/matte paint chips from the Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing of Germany (BAM), and paint and plastic materials obtained from the automotive interior, appliance and trade sales industries.
All samples were measured using the 10° CIE 1964 standard observer under illuminant D65 (daylight). All results are the average of 10 measurements for specular component included mode.
Repeatable Results
The reliability of an instrument to produce repeatable results can be quickly determined by consecutively measuring a sample 10 times. The white calibration tile of the color-guide sphere, a dark blue paint draw dawn, and an orange plastic chip were evaluated. Dark and high chromatic specimens can clearly determine the capability of a color instrument to give repeatable results as very small differences in the measured values cause large differences in the color results.
Average and standard deviation were calculated. The differences of each individual measurement compared to the average are listed in the following table.

For all three samples, differences were well below ÆE* of 0.1. This guarantees reliable results for the user today and tomorrow.
Temperature Independent
For portable color instruments the temperature independence is an important quality criterion. Color standards are measured and stored in the instrument very often in the laboratory. In practice, color differences are evaluated at the production line or outside in the field at a different temperature. For reliable color control the instrument must not show any difference relative to ambient temperature.
To test the temperature influence while measuring, the white standard of each instrument was measured at 10°C. Temperature was then increased using 5°C steps with the resulting ÆE* (Step Original temperature) value reported. Step measurements were made without calibrating the instrument at the higher temperature. The instruments Microflash 200d and Color-Eye 580 did not participate in this test because they automatically ask for calibration after a certain time period.
Fig. 2 shows the results of a temperature range from 1045°C. Even for the highest temperatures, color-guide sphere shows only small differences of ÆE* 0.3. This guarantees stable results without calibration, whether measurements are taken inside or outside. Competitive instruments showed larger drifts and therefore require calibration with temperature changes.

Fig 2
Excellent Inter-Instrument Agreement
Inter-instrument agreement is used to express the capability of two or more identical instruments to measure the same. Generally interpreted the larger the difference the poorer the agreement. Interinstrument agreement becomes important when multiple instruments are in use at a single site, or when a supplier uses the same instrument as his customer.
If the agreement is poor, color communication becomes confused and trouble begins when tolerance values are set lower than the inter-instrument agreement value. Inter-instrument agreement of the color-guide sphere was determined by measuring a complete set of BCRA tiles with 25 instruments. Individual instrument results were subtracted from the average of the 25 results and ÆE* was then computed for each of the tiles.
As shown in Fig. 3 the average ÆE* across the entire spectrum is well below a practical tolerance of ÆE*= 0.5. Reliable and precise color communication is guaranteed when using the color-guide sphere.

fig 3
Precise and Accurate Results
For reliable customer supplier communication it is very important that the used spectrophotometer gives comparable results to other color instruments. As there is no "true value", the BYK-Gardner color-sphere, a bench-top instrument with proven accuracy and precision, was used in this test as the bench mark.
Averages for a range of samples spanning the entire visible spectrum were compared to averages taken by the color-sphere, and the total color difference ÆE* for each sample was computed from the resulting differences. Fig. 4 shows that all instruments give values in a realistic order, but also clearly determines that deviations will occur when comparing absolute values of different color instruments. The main reasons for these differences are:
Because of this, it is highly recommended not to communicate absolute color values. By comparing relative the color differences to a physical standard all available instruments give comparable results.

Fig. 4 Differences between Instruments
Color Regardless of Gloss
As described earlier the sphere geometry, specular component included, measures the complete reflection of a sample surface:
Total reflection = diffuse reflection (color) + direct reflection (gloss)
The influence of gloss was evaluated by comparing the average color difference values of identically pigmented matte and glossy paint samples (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5 Influence of Gloss
color-guide sphere and traditional spectrophotometers showed the same small differences between the two gloss levels. Therefore, all instruments can be used for reliable color measurement regardless of the sample surface condition like it is necessary for incoming QC of raw materials or weathering and temperature influence studies of pigments.
No Influence of Structure and Directionality
Color instruments with sphere geometry illuminate the specimens diffusely by means of a white coated, integrating sphere. The advantage of the diffuse illumination is to achieve more repeatable measurement results on highly directional and structured surfaces, regardless of the measurement direction.
For the following test a structured plastic standard from the automotive interior industry was used. Measurement was done at 0° position. Then the instrument was turned by 90°, 180° and 270° and the ÆE* to the 0° position was calculated (Fig. 6).

color-guide sphere showed no influence of structure on the measurement results. ÆE* compared to the 0° position was always below 0.1. Highly repeatable results are guaranteed no matter in which direction the readings are taken.
Most of the other traditional spectrophotometers also gave repeatable results. Two instruments showed a bigger influence of the structure with ÆE* > 0.2. These instruments require averaging when evaluating structured samples to get a representative value.
Conclusion
The study proves that measurement results for the color-guide sphere rival traditional spectrophotometers guaranteeing high reliability and accuracy. Color control is possible for any specification: all relevant color scales, illuminants and observers are available.
color-guide sphere fulfills all the requirements for portable color control and provides additional benefits never seen in portable instruments before:
In addition, color-guide sphere was also evaluated by the BAM (Test Report S1E0546B).


|
|
____________________________________________________